New kit reviews: HG GN Archer & Gadessa
24 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Last update: 10/01/09
HR GN Archer and HG Gadessa reviews from Plamo Life of Yudai.
HG Gadessa review from Tasukuyuu blog.
HG Gadessa review from Aoi Model Shop.
HG GN Archer review from e-flick.
HG GN Archer review from Tasukuyuu blog.
HG GN Archer review from ホビーの虜
HG GN Archer & Gadessa reviews from Blog-like yard review.
Advertisements
24 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Any moment now, CV will bitch about this model. Prepare yourselves!!!
Comment by Anonymous January 8, 2009 @ 10:53 pmI really hope they don’t pass up a 1/100 GN Archer to go along with the 1/100 Arios
Comment by ShinmeiSuzaku January 8, 2009 @ 11:31 pmI would too. But, I find the Gundam 00 units are a “hit and miss”; There are some units I like, and others I wish they didn’t design at all. =b
I think I’m a little more ticked off that they didn’t animate the Astray series despite the two teasers they made. ;_;
Comment by Nameless January 9, 2009 @ 3:08 amHorrible just like the show.
Comment by Gundam Unicorn January 9, 2009 @ 10:00 pmOh yay! CV found a new name.
Comment by DarkCode January 10, 2009 @ 1:49 amIf Mr Bushido’s Ahead was last year’s worst looking Banpla, then the GN Archer comes in 2nd place. Poor design, weak concept and cheap remake of the G-Defensor from Zeta, Yanase should really commits harakiri for such poor delivery of work.
Comment by codename:v January 10, 2009 @ 2:24 am>> DarkCode
Oh, how insulting. >=(
Comment by Nameless January 10, 2009 @ 2:49 amBecause I like SRW doesn’t mean I HAVE to like everything about Gundam 00.
Calling something “horrible like the show” seems like a pretty CV comment, though, why would you change your name again?
Also, the comment doesn’t add anything constructive to a discussion about a design that perhaps, maybe, other people might enjoy? If you are going to call something terrible, at least say WHY.
Comment by DarkCode January 10, 2009 @ 2:59 am@CV
Go first CV, since your desings are even worst than Yanase’s, and you go and dare to claim that “they are better than the original” which is priceless in a wrong way.
Besides using your standars, Katoki should also do a harakiri for just grabbing the same units and making them more detailed or make non Gundams Desing too much Gundam like, or Obari for making all his robots the same, etc.
Yet we know that at the end, Katoki, Obari, Yanase, etc. are good designers with good works and that easily had done far more stuff and better material that you, with the fanartist liberties, had ever done.
Comment by Anonymouse Za Third January 10, 2009 @ 3:49 am@DarkCode
Comment by realgundam January 10, 2009 @ 6:53 amThat’s not how CV comment… he always explain it with tones of reasons 😛
>>>Dark Code
Oh sorry, I thought you meant me. I completely ignored the lame comment said below me… much like you should since it’s really a waste to bother responding to them. 😄
Comment by Nameless January 10, 2009 @ 8:47 amGadessa’s gun is nasty. Nasty in a good way.
Comment by BD January 10, 2009 @ 1:28 pmThis may be a silly question, but I wonder how well Gadessa can stand with the gun unit attached to its rear armor?
Maybe it’s the angle, but the gun already seems to be drooping to one side. I love the box art on this one.
Comment by BlueAleseides January 10, 2009 @ 6:35 pmno offence Anonymouse Za, but u should perform harakiri for attempting to put the troll named CV in the same category as great illustrators such as katoki, obari and Yanase 😄
Comment by kureha January 11, 2009 @ 12:31 amDefinitely getting the Gadessa.
Comment by crimson_oath January 11, 2009 @ 5:02 am@kureha
Well i’m just using his logic, after all, he complains about stuff the mecha designers does and that he also does and in a worst way.
He obviously isn’t part of that high caliber, but he crticies aspects in mecha desings he actually does on his works, and to make matters worse he claims that he “does it better”.
That’s why he should be the one doing the harakiri first, since he’s commiting the same mistakes he critice so much and acts like if he had some authority or the “only formula” to desing mechas, when we know he doesn’t and he would probably never had it or be influential like Katoki, Obari, etc.
Comment by Anonymouse Za Third January 11, 2009 @ 12:03 pmNow now, I’m sure C:V’s just seeking attention since we’re all now derailed from the topic and were all talking about him, XD.
Back on topic: Gadessa looks sleek, I don’t really like the green in particular, but somehow it just works on that design ^^; Hopefully they’ll have a 1/100 GN Archer in the works though, I would like to stick that pack onto 00 Gundam, and I’m not too keen on Arios’ design to get it’s 1/100.
Comment by Guara January 11, 2009 @ 4:16 pmGadessa box art looks awesome i say but the model can be somewhat questionable
Comment by Ereos January 11, 2009 @ 7:59 pmto me Gadessa is just one of them mobile suits that only look good in the anime not as a model but maybe due in time i might get one
for some reason the GN Archer always remind me to be some sort of girl version of the GM in 0079UC
with super boosters!
>>Guara
Yeah, I don’t like the green color either. Yet, the box art looks so much better. If this model was cheaper, I’d just buy it for the art box. 😄
Comment by Nameless January 12, 2009 @ 2:23 amthe gadessa also has a black sorta color too i wonder if they will release those versions
Comment by Ereos January 13, 2009 @ 5:45 amlike Tieria defeated an innovator who piloted a black gadessa
Considering that this is Bandai, they will.
Comment by Nameless January 14, 2009 @ 12:36 amthe gn archer’s body looks a bit like the dssd astray from the stargazer series.
Comment by t c January 14, 2009 @ 5:56 amI am amazed with it. It is a good thing for my research. Thanks
Comment by Enlargement January 18, 2009 @ 2:33 pmPower Shack…
For us cats there are several sweet advantages in having a human as a pet. However, remember you are taking on a big responsibility when you adopt one or more humans. Humans are demanding pets that need daily care and attention. With responsibility com…
Trackback by Power Shack February 22, 2009 @ 5:25 am