The box art from 1992 was superior to the cheap CG they’re using for the remake in every possible way. The character designs were obviously updated too and the battle sprites replaced with cheap CG. So, yeah. There’s no real *new* art in this version.
@Duran
Sure but does it looks good on that time? Yes, it is, the time different between each released are minor you can expect them to reused things and still looks nice but this, reused something from way back 18 years ago?
I don’t see anything wrong with the cover. I think you just don’t like what you’ve seen of the game and are projecting that hatred onto something that doesn’t actually have any problems.
beautiful just hoping in near future I can see these level of graphic quality in “An SRW” game… and “IN_MOTION” too hehehe~
Comment by JakBoy March 26, 2010 @ 8:11 pmIndeed the mechs looks great but for the cover, no inspiration at all.
Comment by LM March 26, 2010 @ 8:29 pmIrrelevant but cover art suuuuuuuuuuuucks.
So… Are they going to release a special edition or not? I want a book with the new art they are showing in those famitsu scans.
Comment by Anonymous March 26, 2010 @ 8:52 pmThere *is* no new art. They’re using the same fucking character art they’ve had since 1992.
Comment by Kouban March 26, 2010 @ 9:49 pmget your game from play asia 😛
http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-9g-49-en-70-3rui.html
Comment by Banjo March 26, 2010 @ 11:08 pmThe box art from 1992 was superior to the cheap CG they’re using for the remake in every possible way. The character designs were obviously updated too and the battle sprites replaced with cheap CG. So, yeah. There’s no real *new* art in this version.
Comment by Anonymous March 27, 2010 @ 2:57 amthat is like the worst cover i seen for ages…..
Comment by iwantMySRW4Ps3 March 27, 2010 @ 3:12 amis like something taken out of CUT-PASTE….
get your copy from romnation 😛
Comment by gronpas March 27, 2010 @ 3:33 amhttp://www.romnation.net/srv/download/rom/54942/snes204/Super-Robot-Taisen-Gaiden-Masou-Kishin-The-Lord-of-Elemental.html
You folks are acting as if it’s the first time SRW has reused things; it’s not. @G and @3 just used alot of @/@2 stuff.
Comment by Duran March 27, 2010 @ 4:34 am@Duran
Sure but does it looks good on that time? Yes, it is, the time different between each released are minor you can expect them to reused things and still looks nice but this, reused something from way back 18 years ago?
Hope the game is fun though.
Comment by LM March 27, 2010 @ 5:36 amI don’t see anything wrong with the cover. I think you just don’t like what you’ve seen of the game and are projecting that hatred onto something that doesn’t actually have any problems.
Comment by Hiro March 27, 2010 @ 6:22 amNo, this looks probably just like an american version of a japanese game cover.
Comment by K' March 27, 2010 @ 10:37 amWhich household object would you turn yourself into if you had to pick one?
Comment by Jost April 4, 2010 @ 7:44 am